Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 36(1): 2183752, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2283200

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Maternal COVID-19 infection during pregnancy has been associated with adverse neonatal outcomes, such as prematurity and neonatal morbidity. Those adverse events are mainly attributed to maternal factors, rather than to the neonatal infection itself. Our aim is to add our experience and present the neonatal outcome of neonates born to mothers with perinatal SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: This is a prospective case-control study with data from two Academic Tertiary Referral Hospitals in Greece. Electronic records of all births from SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers between March 2020 and April 2021 were analyzed. Demographic data, the severity of maternal COVID-19 disease, gestational age (GA), mode of delivery, birth weight (BW), need for resuscitation and/or supplemental oxygen and duration of hospitalization were recorded. A comparison with 2:1 matched neonates according to sex, GA, and BW born to SARS-CoV-2 negative mothers during the same period was performed. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test were used for categorical and non-categorical variables respectively. RESULTS: A total of eighty-one neonates were born to SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers during this period. Forty-three percent of pregnant mothers were asymptomatic. Median GA and median BW were 38 weeks (Interquantile range (IQR): 36-39 weeks) and 2940 gr (IQR: 2560-3340 gr) respectively. Prematurity was observed in 24.7% of the cases. Only 2 (2.4%) neonates were PCR positive after delivery. SARS-CoV-2 positive women were more likely to undergo Cesarean section. APGAR score at 5 min and the need for resuscitation did not differ between the two groups. In comparison with the control group, neonates born to SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers presented with gastrointestinal symptoms (53.6% vs 5.1%, p-value= <.001) and hospitalization was longer, mostly due to maternal factors. CONCLUSION: In our study neonatal positivity was limited and no vertical transmission was noted. Neonatal outcomes were comparable to the control group. However, the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms in neonates born to PCR-positive women compared to controls needs further investigation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cesarean Section , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Case-Control Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Parturition , Birth Weight
2.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(25): 6704-6707, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2253004

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Early human milk provides protection against viral infections due to its high nutritional value, abundance of maternal antibodies and the specific role of lactoferrin (Lf). Lf blocks the early interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and host cells by binding to specific cell receptors and has been proposed as a preventative and adjunct treatment for COVID-19. This preliminary report aimed to investigate concentrations of Lf in early milk of SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers versus non-infected controls. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a cohort of 13 SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers and 15 controls, breast milk concentrations of Lf were determined by ELISA on day 3 postpartum. Additionally, colostrum samples of infected mothers were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA and IgG determination using RT-qPCR and ELISA, respectively. RESULTS: No differences were found in breast milk Lf concentrations between SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers and controls. In a subgroup analysis, however, symptomatic mothers (n = 7) presented with lower breast milk Lf concentrations, as compared to asymptomatic mothers (p = .041) and healthy controls (p = .029). All milk samples tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Early human milk of infected mothers displayed IgA and IgG SARS-CoV-2 specific reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed a different early breast milk Lf "profile" between COVID-19 symptomatic and asymptomatic mothers with the latter being at non-COVID levels (control group). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not detected in any breast milk sample. Early human milk Lf levels are potentially influenced by the severity of maternal COVID-19 infection during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Milk, Human , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Milk, Human/chemistry , Lactoferrin , SARS-CoV-2 , Immunoglobulin A , Immunoglobulin G
4.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(25): 8706-8709, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1510819

ABSTRACT

This study comprehensively examines clinical symptoms, laboratory findings, and placental pathology in 40 cases of singleton full-term SARS-CoV-2 negative neonates. Their mothers, previously healthy, with uncomplicated pregnancies, were infected peripartum and presented COVID-19 symptoms of various severity. Neonates had predominately diarrhea, the yet unreported absent sucking reflex, elevated COVID-19 inflammatory and ischemia/asphyxia markers as serum ferritin, interleukin-6 and cardiac troponin-T, while placentas demonstrated mild vascular and/or inflammatory lesions. We hypothesize that the above placental lesions may be associated with transient perinatal hypoxia resulting in absent sucking reflex, as well as with inflammatory cytokines transfer causing diarrhea.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Infant, Newborn , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Placenta/pathology , Parturition , Diarrhea
5.
Front Pediatr ; 9: 713930, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1506685

ABSTRACT

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine use has increased within community pediatrics. This trend runs counter to reluctance to adaptation of the new mode of healthcare that existed prior to the pandemic. Little is known about what we can expect after the pandemic: if physicians will opt for telemedicine modalities and if tele-pediatrics will continue to be a significant mode of community pediatric care. Objective: The goal of this study was to survey primary pediatric care providers as to their experiences and clinical decision making with telemedicine modalities prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as their projected use after the pandemic ends. Material and methods: Using the EAPRASnet database we surveyed pediatricians throughout Europe, using a web-based questionnaire. The survey was performed during the COVID-19 pandemic (June-July 2020), assessed telemedicine use for several modalities, prior to and during the pandemic as well as predicted use after the pandemic will have resolved. Participants were also surveyed regarding clinical decision making in two hypothetical clinical scenarios managed by telemedicine. Results: A total of 710 physicians participated, 76% were pediatricians. The percentage of respondents who reported daily use for at least 50% of all encounters via telemedicine modalities increased during the pandemic: phone calls (4% prior to the pandemic to 52% during the pandemic), emails (2-9%), text messages (1-6%), social media (3-11%), cell-phone pictures/video (1-9%), and video conferencing (1-7%) (p < 0.005). The predicted post-pandemic use of these modalities partially declined to 19, 4, 3, 6, 9, and 4%, respectively (p < 0.005), yet demonstrating a prospectively sustained use of pictures/videos after the pandemic. Reported high likelihood of remotely treating suspected pneumonia and acute otitis media with antibiotics decreased from 8 to 16% during the pandemic to an assumed 2 and 4% after the pandemic, respectively (p < 0.005). Conclusions: This study demonstrates an increased utilization of telemedicine by pediatric providers during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as a partially sustained effect that will promote telemedicine use as part of a hybrid care provision after the pandemic will have resolved.

6.
Epidemiol Infect ; 149: e70, 2021 02 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1142396

ABSTRACT

As most children infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) present with mild symptoms or they are asymptomatic, the optimal strategy for molecular testing it is not well defined. The aim of the study was to determine the extent and aetiology of molecular testing for SARS-CoV-2 in Greek paediatric departments during the first phase of the pandemic and identify possible differences in incidence, depending on the age group and geographical area. We conducted a nationwide study of molecular testing for SARS-CoV-2 of children in paediatric departments between March and June 2020. A total of 65 paediatric departments participated in the study, representing 4901 children who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 and 90 (1.8%) were positive. Most paediatric cases were associated with topical outbreaks. Adolescents 11-16 years had the highest positivity rate (3.6%) followed by children 6-10 years (1.9%). However, since the testing rate significantly differed between age groups, the modified incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection per age group was highest in infants <1 year (19.25/105 population). Most children tested presented with fever (70.9%), respiratory (50.1%) or gastrointestinal symptoms (28.1%). Significant differences were detected between public and private hospitals regarding the positivity rate (2.34% vs. 0.39%, P-value <0.001). Significant variation in SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing positivity rate and incidence between age groups indicate discrepancies in risk factors among different age groups that shall be considered when ordering molecular testing.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospital Departments , Pediatrics , Adolescent , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/physiopathology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Hotspot , Female , Greece/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , SARS-CoV-2
7.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(19): 3776-3782, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-915831

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 pandemic has raised questions on pregnant women and newborns' management. Guidelines, issued by most international agencies and national bodies, recommend rooming-in and direct breastfeeding. In the early days of this pandemic, breastfeeding practices have been challenged by fear among both parents and healthcare workers occasionally resulting in mother-newborn separation. We herein review current breastfeeding guidelines and discuss remaining questions and challenges. As we are facing the second wave of this pandemic, more information is gathered, especially regarding possible virus transmissibility through breastfeeding, enabling more definite instructions about breastfeeding practices.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Breast Feeding , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Mothers , Pandemics , Pregnancy , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL